四個角色分別怎麼看
Four roles, four readings
同一批資料,四個不同的專業視角。點開看各自最強的主張。
The same material, read through four different professional lenses. Open each for its sharpest claim.
創意總監Creative Director 主軸換成村民,密勒日巴降為第二拍 Lead with the villagers; Milarepa moves to the second beat
受益者在募款開始之前、用自己的語言、沒有被問到募款的情況下說的話 —— 這是公信力的最高形式,比任何仁波切推薦、任何建築獎項都強。
Words spoken by the beneficiaries, in their own language, before any fundraising began and without being asked about it. That is the highest form of credibility — stronger than any teacher's endorsement or architectural prize.
- 視覺概念:外面的光 / 裡面的光。 判準可直接發包 —— 每張照片都要能歸類為「外面」或「裡面」,不能歸類的不用。
- 禁絕金色與絳紅。 那是每個藏傳募款的預設視覺,會直接過濾掉要打的普羅大眾。
- 村民引述那一屏不配照片。 引言壓在風景照上會讀起來像心靈勵志海報。
- 黑白只給已故者,活著的村子一律彩色。 這條規則本身就在說「傳承還活著」。
- 年輕的解法:村子要的不是一位有名的喇嘛,是一位不會走的喇嘛。
- Visual concept: the light outside / the light inside. A brief you can commission against — every photograph must be classifiable as one or the other. If it is neither, don't use it.
- No gold, no maroon. That palette is the default of every Tibetan Buddhist appeal, and it filters out exactly the general public you want to reach.
- The villager quotation gets no photograph. A quote laid over a landscape reads as an inspirational poster; unadorned, it reads as testimony.
- Black and white only for those who have died. The living village stays in colour. The rule itself says the lineage is still alive.
- On youth: the village doesn't need a famous lama. It needs one who won't leave.
募款執行主管Fundraising Director 真正的死線是匯款到帳日,不是開挖日 The real deadline is when the money lands, not when digging starts
募款失敗不會殺死專案,付款延遲會。
Failing to raise the money won't kill this project. Paying late will.
- 緩衝是負的。 餘額 $11,406,已規劃支出 $11,791。募款是事件驅動、以週為單位;工程款是合約驅動、以天為單位。
- 補法不是募款,是橋接額度 —— 向大額施主要「可撤回墊款承諾」:款未到位先墊,募到就還。
- 越南三人不是捐款人,是施主。 單人平均 $3,667,台灣約 $100–150,差 25–35 倍。用進度條與電子報對待他們是降級。
- 低調限制的是「公開」,不是「往來」 —— 一對一、封閉群組、線下見面完全不受影響。
- 具體提案:三人共同認領一間閉關房,每人 $7,667,是既有金額的 1.9 倍。
- 但第一優先是分散風險:37% 壓在三個人,一人退出收入立掉 13%。
- The buffer is negative. $11,406 on hand against $11,791 already committed. Fundraising moves in weeks and by event; construction payments move in days and by contract.
- The fix isn't more fundraising, it's a bridge — ask one or two major donors for a recallable advance: cover it if the money is late, repaid when it arrives.
- The three Vietnamese donors are patrons, not donors. $3,667 each against roughly $100–150 in Taiwan — twenty-five to thirty-five times. Progress bars and newsletters demote them.
- “Low profile” restricts publicity, not contact. One-to-one, closed groups and meeting in person are entirely unaffected.
- Concrete ask: the three of them together dedicate one cottage — $7,667 each, 1.9× what they already give.
- But risk first: 37% of income rests on three people. One withdrawal costs 13%.
建築專案經理Construction PM 切分交付:今年只挖,不砌 Split the delivery: dig this year, build next
時程是照募款節奏排的,不是照工程節奏排的。
The schedule was built around the fundraising rhythm, not the construction one.
- 今年只做整地、開挖、石礎 —— 這三項不含水泥養護,不怕霜期。石砌牆與 PCC 留到明年春天。
- 理由:砂漿未達強度就過冬,凍融循環會裂掉石砌基礎,明年要打掉重做。
- 而且這樣今年仍有交付 —— 有動土照片、有可驗證進度,不是「今年什麼都沒發生」。
- 現在不做、以後很貴的事:基礎預埋套管、全區電力容量、污水處理位置、施工便道、測量基準點。
- 好消息:金剛瑜伽母廟已有概念設計與定案位置,不是「尚未設計」。
- 真正的空白:團體教學廳 —— 兩份簡報裡完全不存在,而它會是全區最大的量體。
- This year: clearance, excavation, stone soling only. None of these involve curing mortar, so frost is not a risk. Stone walling and PCC wait for spring.
- Why: mortar that has not reached strength before winter will crack through freeze–thaw, and the foundation gets demolished and rebuilt.
- And there is still a delivery this year — ground broken, photographs, verifiable progress. Not “nothing happened.”
- Cheap now, expensive later: foundation sleeves and conduits, site-wide electrical capacity, the position of wastewater treatment, a construction access track, permanent survey benchmarks.
- Good news: the Vajrayogini temple already has a concept design and a fixed position.
- The real blank: the group teaching hall appears in neither presentation — and it will be the largest volume on the site.
品牌經理Brand Director 信任來源目前沒有一項屬於他本人 None of the trust currently belongs to him
誠實的沒進度,比擠出來的假進度更保信任。消耗信任的從來不是沉默, 是明明沒事卻硬發文。
An honest “no progress” protects trust better than manufactured progress. Silence is not what costs you credibility — posting when nothing has happened is.
- 最大的風險:密勒日巴、噶千仁波切、澈贊法王、SMA、三代傳承 —— 每一項都很強, 但全是借來的。一旦其中一項變動,敘事會同時塌掉一大塊。
- 借力露出比,逐年遞減:2026 年 7:3 → 2027 年 5:5 → 2028 年 3:7,每季檢查。
- 噶千素材只放拉新入口,不放維繫層 —— 電子報、社群日常、書只能是他自己的話。
- 停工期怎麼溝通:施工季(4–10 月)交付,冬季(11–3 月)做檔案,而且事先公告這個節奏 —— 預告過的空窗不算失約。
- 越南:不點名、不感謝、不出現在任何公開頁面。真正的風險不在品牌,在關係管理 —— 那三個人現在沒有人負責維繫。
- The largest risk: Milarepa, Garchen Rinpoche, His Holiness, SMA, three generations — every source of trust is strong, and every one of them is borrowed. If one moves, a large part of the story collapses with it.
- Ratchet the borrowing down: 7:3 in 2026, 5:5 in 2027, 3:7 in 2028. Reviewed quarterly.
- Borrowed material belongs at the top of the funnel only — the newsletter, the daily feed and the book must be his own words.
- Communicating through the shutdown: deliver during the building season (Apr–Oct), publish from the archive in winter (Nov–Mar), and announce that rhythm in advance. A gap you predicted is not a broken promise.
- Vietnam: no names, no public thanks, no presence on any public page. The real risk is not brand, it is relationship management — nobody currently owns those three people.
已決與未決
Settled and open
Grand Café 對村民開放
The Grand Café is open to the village
有活動時是閉關學生的餐廳廚房,其他時間是村子的地方,全年是登山客的咖啡廳。 這一條是整套村民敘事成立的前提。而「登山客」這一層還帶來未來的營運收入與國際能見度。
A kitchen and dining hall for retreatants during events, a village space the rest of the time, and a café for trekkers all year. This is what makes the village-led story honest — and the trekkers also bring future operating income and international visibility.
噶千仁波切影音的授權
Permission for the Garchen Rinpoche footage
33.9 分鐘的對談加 6 分鐘的瑪南緣起,是最強的國際素材,但授權從未詢問,已拖三個月。 建議翻轉問法:不要問「舊影片能不能用」,問「能不能請仁波切為這個計劃錄 60 秒」—— 前者要對方評估風險,後者是請加持,而且拿到的更好。
Thirty-four minutes of conversation plus six minutes on the origins of Manang — the strongest international material we hold, and permission has never been requested. Three months have passed. Better framing: don't ask whether the old footage may be used; ask whether Rinpoche would record sixty seconds for this project. The first asks him to assess a risk; the second asks for a blessing.
認領與大眾募款,誰是主線
Named dedication or the general fund — which leads
對大眾講的主線是大眾募款(門檻低、人人可參與),但把盤子吃掉一半的是認領。 這其實是兩個不同的動作:認領要靠一對一,不靠公開文案。要決定的是公開頁面上兩者怎麼並存。
The public message leads with the general fund — low threshold, anyone can join. But it is the named dedications that swallow half the budget, and those are won one-to-one, not by landing-page copy. What needs deciding is how the two sit together on the same page.
三個網站要不要收成一個
Consolidate three websites into one
創意總監與品牌經理獨立得出同一個結論:現有的三站規劃是最糟的決定。 志工人力拆三份、內容都還沒有,而把「故事—進度—捐款」切開會在每次跳轉流失轉換。
The creative and brand leads reached the same conclusion independently: the three-site plan is the worst decision on the table. It splits scarce volunteer capacity three ways, none of the three has content yet, and separating story, progress and giving loses people at every jump.
村民的肖像與具名同意
Consent to name and show the villagers
內容解禁與肖像、姓名的對外使用同意是兩件事。若沒有明確同意: 保留引述,只寫年齡與村名,不具全名、不露臉。
Clearing the content is not the same as clearing likeness and name. Without explicit consent: keep the quotations, give age and village only, no full names and no faces.
文件在哪裡
Where everything lives
一份資料只有一個正本。這一頁是對外與對團隊的說明, 細節都在底下的檔案裡;要改內容,改檔案,不要改這一頁。
One source of truth per item. This page is the explanation; the detail lives in the files below. To change something, change the file, not this page.
| 內容What | 正本位置Source of truth |
|---|---|
| 仁波切的話(Berkeley + 上課錄音,可直接引用) Rinpoche's own words (Berkeley + teaching recording, quotable) | 07-Manang/output/仁波切的話_素材庫.md |
| 募款與出版計劃(金額階梯、分期、出版節奏) Fundraising & publishing plan | 07-Manang/output/募款與出版計劃.md |
| Campaign 1 文案與主視覺(可直接發包) Campaign 1 copy & art direction | 07-Manang/output/Campaign1_文案.md |
| 背景整理(人、地、社群、時間線、素材清冊) Background brief | 07-Manang/output/GCDR背景整理.md |
| 村民訪談(中英對照,原語瑪南語) Villager interviews (bilingual, recorded in Manangi) | 07-Manang/output/村民訪談_中英對照.txt |
| 建築圖說、BoQ、成本表、甘特圖 Drawings, BoQ, cost estimate, Gantt | 07-Manang/Building plan/ · Grand cafe foundation plan/ |
| 傳記(藏英對照,三份)Biographies (Tibetan–English) | 07-Manang/reference/ · GCDR/Manang/Biography/ |
| 護持方案(已發布,中英雙語)Dedication plan (published) | GCDR/Manang-plan/Release/ |
| 財務系統與收據Finance system & receipts | GCDR/Manang-tool/ · manang-fin.netlify.app |
| 藏文逐字稿校訂台(噶千仁波切影音的前置) Tibetan transcript collation desk | tibcollate.pages.dev |
| 影像素材(1,389 張照片 · 63 支影片) Image library (1,389 photos · 63 videos) | Photos 相簿:ManangTrip25(986)、Manang-sato-pick(267)、Mila-buildup(335)、Food - Mila(144) Photos albums: ManangTrip25 (986), Manang-sato-pick (267), Mila-buildup (335), Food - Mila (144) |
| Mila Mandala 茶屋(加德滿都,Grand Café 的原型) Mila Mandala teahouse (Kathmandu, prototype of the Grand Café) | 04-teahouse/ · 04-teahouse/output/店內佈置_瑪南牆與菜單.md |
維護方式
How to keep this current
- 這一頁:`07-Manang/web/index.html`,改完用
npx wrangler pages deploy web --project-name manang重新發布 - 決策紀錄:每拍板一件,就把它從「未決」搬到「已決」,並寫下理由。不要刪掉舊的,搬過去 —— 半年後會有人問「為什麼當初這樣決定」
- 數字口徑:全案一律 US$585,000;海拔一律 3,397 公尺。舊的 552,000 與 3,500 全部停用
- This page:
07-Manang/web/index.html; redeploy withnpx wrangler pages deploy web --project-name manang - Decision log: when something is settled, move it from open to settled and write down why. Move it, don't delete it — in six months someone will ask why it was decided that way
- Figures: US$585,000 for the whole project; 3,397 metres. The older 552,000 and 3,500 are retired
視覺方向
The visual direction
你正在看的就是提案。四個顏色、兩種字體、一個結構裝置。
What you are reading is the proposal. Four colours, two typefaces, one structural device.
#F5F2EC紙白 · 外面的光Paper · the light outside
#F3EBDD暖紙 · 只給人聲與 CaféWarm paper · voices and the café only
#6E6357石板灰褐 · 牆的顏色Slate brown · the colour of the wall
#C8622A燈火橘 · 只用在行動與進度Lamp · action and progress only
#1C1A17近黑 · 不用純黑Near-black · never pure black
為什麼是石板灰褐。 估價單上,石砌基礎牆佔了地基造價的百分之四十八 —— 當地的石頭、當地的石匠、手工砌成。這個案子的顏色就該是石頭的顏色,不是金色。
Why slate brown. On the bill of quantities, stone walling is forty-eight per cent of the foundation cost — local stone, local masons, laid by hand. The colour of this project should be the colour of that wall, not gold.
為什麼暖色只用在按鈕。 如果暖色到處都是,它不代表任何事; 只出現在「捐款」上,那個動作在視覺上就等於加一盞燈。
Why the warm colour appears only on the button. Warmth everywhere means nothing. Warmth reserved for the act of giving makes that act, visually, the lighting of a lamp.
結構裝置:外面 / 裡面。 冷的段落(山谷、數字、工程)用冷紙底; 暖的段落(村民的話、Café)才給暖底與燈火色。暖是掙來的,不是環境音。
The structural device: outside / inside. Cold sections — the valley, the numbers, the construction — sit on cool paper. Only the warm sections, the villagers' voices and the café, get warm ground and the lamp. Warmth is earned, not ambient.