瑪南閉關園區
內部簡報
Manang Retreat Campus
Internal Brief
這裡是瑪南瑜伽母閉關園區(Yogini Retreat Manang)的內部工作平台。 台灣與越南的執行團隊在這裡看同一份事實、把待決的事攤開來討論; 二十八份原始資料全在文庫,可全文搜尋。 This is the internal workspace for Yogini Retreat Manang. The teams in Taiwan and Vietnam work here from one set of facts, and settle what is still open; all twenty-eight source documents sit in the Library, searchable in full.
這些都服務於同一件事。 All of it serves one thing.
「這不只是一棟建築,更是一個社群。」 “It is not just about a building. It is about a community.” 奇美多傑仁波切 · 柏克萊 · 2026-04-22 Chimi Dorjee Rinpoche · Berkeley · 22 April 2026
他的原話都在這裡,沒有轉述。先弄懂那個願景,其餘的決定才有依據。 His own words are here, unparaphrased. Understand that vision first — every other decision rests on it.
四個數字Four numbers
從最大到最小,三層Three levels, largest to smallest
團隊常混淆的地方,是把這三層當成同一件事。它們的時間尺度差很多。 The usual confusion is treating these three as one thing. Their time scales differ enormously.
計劃是怎麼走到今天的 How we got here
創立噶爾慈愛基金會 Chimi Dorjee appointed by H.H.
Gar Jamtse Foundation founded
850 年來第一次 H.H. gives transmission
first in 850 years
設計費已付清 SMA design, Berkeley launch
design fee paid
我們在這裡 Foundation begins
we are here
這些不會變,可以直接引用These are settled and quotable
每一條都有出處。沒有出處的不要寫進文案 —— 這個計劃的可信度就建立在這件事上。 Every line has a source. Do not put anything unsourced into copy — the credibility of this project rests on exactly this.
瑪瑟家族是蘇曼噶舉的源頭 The Mase family founded Zurmang Kagyü
家族世系源自竹・瑪瑟・卻吉羅卓,蘇曼噶舉傳承的創始者。 這個家族不是誰的分支,它自己就是一個傳承的源頭。 The line descends from Drung Mase Chökyi Lodrö, founder of the Zurmang Kagyü. This family is not a branch of someone else's lineage — it is where one begins.
出處:《瑪瑟・噶瑪竹舉丹增仁波切傳》藏文原稿 Source: Tibetan biography of Mase Karma Drubgyud Tenzin Rinpoche
噶千仁波切不是來背書的 Garchen Rinpoche is not endorsing us
血親 —— 梅隆藏巴是噶千仁波切七位叔叔之一,而他的兄弟阿僧尼瑪就是噶千的父親。
師徒,方向相反 —— 第一世奇美多傑是噶千仁波切的上師。
By blood — Melong Tsampa was one of Garchen Rinpoche's seven uncles;
his brother Aseng Nyima was Garchen Rinpoche's father.
By transmission, running backwards — the first Chimi Dorjee was Garchen Rinpoche's
teacher.
出處:兩份藏文傳記 + 孕育計劃中英版,互相印證 Source: two Tibetan biographies + the Incubation Plan, mutually confirming
850 年來第一次 First time in 850 years
2024 年 9 月,直貢澈贊法王親臨瑪南,於園區預定地傳授大遷識法與長壽灌頂。
四十多個村落、上千人。這是直貢傳承 850 年來法王首度親臨。
而且順序很重要:先服務,再募款。
In September 2024 H.H. the Drikung Chetsang Rinpoche came to Manang and gave
phowa and long-life empowerment on the campus site. Forty villages, over a thousand people.
The first visit by a Drikung throne holder in 850 years.
And the order matters: serve first, then ask.
SMA 是非營利,而且得過獎 SMA is non-profit, and award-winning
尼泊爾與歐洲建築師組成的非營利團隊,長期做高山與國家公園案子。 2025 年獲法國全球最佳石屋建築獎首獎。第一期設計費已付清 —— 現在募的不是設計費。 A non-profit Nepal–Europe team working in high mountains and national parks. Winner of the France Global Best Stone Architecture Award 2025. The Phase I design fee is paid — we are not raising design fees.
仁波切自己的話In Rinpoche's own words
引用規則:英文是他本人所講,中文是譯稿。以英文為準,不要回譯。 Quotation rule: the English is what he actually said; the Chinese is a translation. Quote from the English.
「我開始做夢。開始投入 —— 不是把一個計劃帶去那裡, 是真的想把自己的生命投進那片土地。這不只是一棟建築,更是一個社群。」 “I started to dream. And I started to invest — not bringing some project there. I truly wanted to invest my life there. It is not just about a building. It is about a community.”
柏克萊大學,2026-04-22 ｜ 他說的 invest 指心力、時間與生命 —— 不只是金錢 UC Berkeley, 22 Apr 2026 ｜ “invest” here means his attention, time and life — not money alone
這個地方要對人做什麼(他自己講的四階段) What the place does to a person — his own four moves
誰可以來Who it is for
「如果你在乎 —— 那很好。你就是對的人。無論你生來是不信仰的人、 還是信仰其他宗教,都無所謂。法不做任何區分。」 “If you care — good. You are the right person. Whether you were born without belief or in another religion makes no difference. Dharma does not discriminate.”
怎麼運作(已定)How it runs (settled)
- 短期個人閉關,最長十天Short retreats, ten days max
- 四季各一種修持,第一個是息瓦 One practice per season, beginning with Shiwa
- 對社群「隨時準備好服務,但要精準切入」 “Always ready to serve, but deliberately and precisely”
園區八項,狀態各不相同Eight facilities, very different states
| 設施Facility | 狀態State | 說明Note |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Café | 第一期Phase I | 有設計圖與估價 · US$65,000 · 2027 全面開工 Drawn and costed · US$65,000 · full start 2027 |
| 上師房(最上層 4 間)Teacher rooms (top tier, 4) | 第一期Phase I | US$135,000 · 2027 先蓋這一棟(由上往下) US$135,000 · built first in 2027 (top down) |
| 閉關房 17 間17 retreat cottages | 第一期Phase I | US$307,000 · 在坡地下方 · 2028 起 US$307,000 · lower on the slope · 2028 onward |
| 供水與基礎設施Water shed & services | 第一期Phase I | US$100,000 · 依募款成效逐年分配 US$100,000 · allocated by what is raised each year |
| 金剛亥母殿Vajrayogini Temple | 有圖無錢Drawn, unfunded | 園區的核心,有概念設計與定案位置,沒有預算,不在 607K 內 The heart of the campus; concept design and a fixed position, no budget, outside the 607K |
| 教學大殿Teaching hall | 僅構想Concept only | 無設計圖、無估價No drawings, no costing |
| 老年閉關區Elderly retreat | 僅構想Concept only | 給當地長者與早期修行人For local elders and early practitioners |
| 八塔Eight stupas | 僅構想Concept only | 象徵佛陀八大事蹟The Buddha's eight great deeds |
施工順序:由上往下 Build order: top down
2027 H.H. / Rinpoche / Lopon / visitor
2027
2028 起3 × triple units
from 2028
之後4 × duo units
later
SMA 的三個原則SMA's three principles
Grand Café 夏季 604 m³ → 冬季 270 m³,用犛牛毛與羊毛重簾把天花板降下來, 簾子花紋取自當地織法 604 m³ in summer → 270 m³ in winter, using heavy yak- and sheep-wool curtains, in local weaving patterns
中央的喜馬拉雅火箭爐,用的是隨手可撿的細枝 The central Himalayan rocket stove, burning small sticks that are easy to gather
黑刺柏等當地灌木;另有藥用植物清單 Black juniper and other local shrubs; plus a medicinal-plant list
一個基金,分幾波推One fund, several waves
一條進度條 Not earmarked by building
one progress bar
2027 年:募多少就做多少 2027: what is raised decides what is built
如果冬天結束前沒到 20 萬,那是「明年做少一點」,不是「停工」 —— 這是分年推進最重要的安全閥。 This ladder is the copy: “Raise 200K and the teachers' rooms and the café start next year; every further step completes another piece of ground, water or path.” Each level maps to something you can see.
If winter ends below 200K, that means less gets built, not that work stops — the most important safety valve in building year by year.
Campaign 的波次Campaign waves
| 何時When | 目標Target | 對外講什麼The story | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 第 0 波Wave 0 | 現在 – 2026 秋now – autumn 2026 | $10,000 | 地基。已募一半。「讓工程能動起來的第一鏟」 The foundation. Half raised. “The first spadeful” |
| 第 1 波Wave 1 | 2026 秋 – 冬autumn–winter 2026 | $200,000 | 明年開工。上師房 4 間 + Grand Café Next year's start. 4 teacher rooms + Grand Café |
| 第 2–4 波Waves 2–4 | 接續following on | +$30k / +$35k / +$35k | 整地擋土 → 水電排水 → 水利步道景觀 site prep → services → watershed and paths |
| 此後Thereafter | 每年冬天every winter | — | 募下一年那一批。這會是往後每年的固定循環 Raise for the following year. This becomes the annual cycle |
已製作 · 未公開Made · not yet public 已經有一份正式的護持方案A formal dedication plan already exists
2026 年 5 月已製作,中文 / 繁中 / 英文三個版本 ——
但目前只給少數已有信心的學生私下看過,尚未對外公開。
這代表:裡面的承諾對那幾位是有效的,但整份方案還可以修改。
新的文案要跟它對齊,而如果要改,現在是還來得及的時候。
Produced in May 2026 in three language versions — but so far shown only
privately, to a small number of students who already have confidence in the project.
It has not been made public.
So: the commitments in it hold for those few people, but the plan itself can still be
revised. New material should align with it — and if it needs changing, now is still the
moment.
US$23,000 / 間 = NT$725,000(匯率 31.5)= VND 610,000,000
已含:① 建造費用 ② 基礎工程與水利設施分攤 ③ 石刻題名 ④ 祈願回向
US$23,000 per cottage = NT$725,000 = VND 610,000,000
Includes: ① construction ② share of groundworks and watershed ③ stone
inscription ④ aspiration prayers and dedication of merit
17 間開放個人認領(雙單位 8、三單位 9)
4 間大眾共同護持 —— 法王關房(附侍者房)、仁波切關房、閉關上師關房
17 open for individual dedication (8 duo, 9 triple)
4 held for collective support — H.H.'s chamber with attendant's room, Rinpoche's
chamber, the Drubpon's chamber
這和「所有護持者共同刻在一面牆上」是兩種不同的做法,可以並存,但要先講清楚誰是哪一種。 Stone inscription is not a new idea — it is already a formal promise. The English version is specific: “a carved stone plaque bearing the dedicant's name, permanently placed at the room” — one plaque per room, at that room.
That is a different mechanism from a shared wall carrying every supporter's name. Both can exist, but who gets which must be settled first.
護持者拿到什麼What supporters receive
每一次動工都舉行儀式,為所有護持者迴向 Every start of work is marked with a ceremony, dedicated for all supporters
整個園區都是石砌 —— 地基、上師房、閉關房、步道擋土牆。 每一波 campaign 都有自己的石頭 The whole campus is stone — foundation, cottages, paths, retaining walls. Every campaign wave has its own stone
而且它給了募款最需要的東西:真實的截止日。「捐款到 X 日截止,名字會刻進這一期的石頭」—— 石頭砌上去就不能再加名字,這個急迫感是工程給的,不是編的。 Three advantages: ① no tiers — a small gift and a large one are carved on the same wall ② stone has no limit, rooms do (there are only 17) ③ fully compatible with one fund.
And it gives fundraising the thing it most needs: a real deadline. “Give by this date and your name goes into this season's stone.” Once the stone is laid, no name can be added. That urgency comes from the work itself.
實體的東西是給那個地方的;照片是給護持者的。 The thing most easily forgotten, and the most important: most supporters will never go to Manang. So the real deliverable is not the stone but a photograph of the stone, sent to each of them. Film the ceremony, photograph the carving close up, and send it to every supporter rather than posting it and waiting.
The object belongs to the place. The photograph belongs to the supporter.
往回推,不是往前排Worked backwards, not forwards
US$10,000,已募一半。動工儀式與第一批刻名在這時候發生 US$10,000, half raised. The first ceremony and the first carved names happen here
現在的網站是內部審閱版,不是募款頁。這是所有後續動作的前提 The current site is an internal draft, not an appeal. Everything else depends on this
不能等地基募完再開始 —— 兩件事在時間上重疊,不是接續 Cannot wait for the foundation round to finish — these overlap, they do not queue
匯款到尼泊爾要審查兩個月。這一條把所有日期往前推了兩個月 Remittance to Nepal takes two months to clear. This one constraint moves every other date forward
看基金餘額,決定今年做哪幾項、發包多少 The fund balance decides what is contracted this year
上師房 4 間 + Grand Café 開工 4 teacher rooms and the Grand Café start
每個節點交付:照片、花了多少、對到估價單哪一項 Report at each milestone: photographs, spend, and the BoQ line it maps to
此後每年一輪。募款不是一次性活動,是每年冬天固定要做的事 And every year after. Fundraising is not an event; it is what winter is for
我們怎麼一起做這件事How we work together
願景在上,執行在下 Vision above, execution below
整體願景與執行守則由仁波切訂定 —— 園區要成為什麼、要對人做什麼、 對外呈現的分寸。這一層不由團隊決定,團隊依循它工作。 台灣中心與越南中心負責執行:把計劃介紹出去、推廣出去,以及募款。 Rinpoche sets the vision and the working principles — what the campus is to become, what it is for, and how it presents itself. That layer is not the team's to decide. The Taiwan and Vietnam centres carry out the work: introducing the project, spreading it, and raising the funds.
| 誰Who | 負責什麼Responsible for |
|---|---|
| 仁波切Rinpoche | 整體願景、執行守則、對外呈現的分寸 The vision, the working principles, how the project presents itself |
| 台灣中心Taiwan centre | 計劃介紹與推廣、募款、金流與收據、網站與社群 Introducing and promoting the project, fundraising, payments and receipts, the website and social channels |
| 越南中心Vietnam centre | 計劃介紹與推廣、募款 Introducing and promoting the project, fundraising |
| SMA | 建築設計與工程。技術細節不由我們審查 Architecture and construction; the engineering detail is not ours to review |
寫東西的守則 How we write
- 不以頭銜開場。瑪瑟家族五、六百年從不宣揚自己是誰 —— 這是傳承本身的做法,不是行銷選擇。 Never lead with titles. The Mase family has not announced itself for five or six centuries — that is the lineage's own practice, not a marketing position.
- 先服務,再募款。2024 年請直貢澈贊法王到瑪南主法, 是在向任何人開口之前先回饋當地。 Serve first, then ask. His Holiness was invited to Manang in 2024 to give something back before anyone was asked for anything.
- 引用一律用原話。仁波切的英文以柏克萊講稿為準,不從中文回譯。 Quote the original. Rinpoche's English comes from the Berkeley transcript, never back-translated from Chinese.
- 有出處才寫進文案。這個計劃的可信度就建立在這件事上。 Nothing goes into copy without a source. The credibility of the project rests on it.
- 事實比形容詞有力。不寫「壯麗的喜馬拉雅」「心靈的故鄉」。 Facts beat adjectives. No "majestic Himalaya", no "spiritual homeland".
- 數字口徑:第一期 US$607,000(高標),不含金剛瑜伽母殿與後續各期; 海拔 3,397 公尺。舊的 552,000、585,000 與 3,500 停用。 園區名稱一律 Yogini Retreat Manang,工作小組是 Manang Vision。 Figures: Phase I is US$607,000 at the high estimate, excluding the Vajrayogini temple and all later phases; 3,397 metres. The older 552,000, 585,000 and 3,500 are retired. The campus is called Yogini Retreat Manang; the working group is Manang Vision.
已經定下來的做法 Already settled
- 建築由 SMA 決定。不用水泥,在地材料與工法;閉關房沿等高線散開, 彼此看不到對方,嵌進坡裡不高過村子的屋頂。 SMA decides the architecture. No concrete; local materials and methods. Cottages spread along the contours so none overlooks another, set into the slope, never rising above the village roofs.
- Grand Café 對村民開放。有活動時是團體閉關的餐廚, 其他時間是村子可以用的地方,全年是登山客能走進來的咖啡廳與社區中心。 整套村民敘事都建立在這一條上。 The Grand Café is open to the village. Kitchen and dining hall during programmes, a room the village can use the rest of the time, and a café any trekker may walk into all year. Everything we say about serving the village rests on this.
- 全部都是大眾共同募款,這是唯一的主線。 個人認領(一間閉關房 $23,000)只是額外的一個選項,另外寫,不跟主線並列。 Everything is one collective fund — that is the only line. Dedicating a cottage individually ($23,000) is an extra option, written separately.
- 捐款人不分地區處理。進度、電子報、交付報告一視同仁; 部分地區的收據是累積後合併開立,那是行政節奏,不影響對待方式。 Donors are handled the same everywhere. Progress, newsletter and delivery reports go to all alike; in some places receipts are batched, which is an administrative rhythm.
- 兩個網站:瑪南計劃一個獨立網站,仁波切一個個人網站。 Two websites: an independent one for the Manang project, and a personal one for Rinpoche.
這次開會要決定的What this meeting is for
網域與正式信箱Domain and proper email addresses
現在對外用的是 GCDRcommunity@gmail.com,而網站掛在
pages.dev 的子網域上。要收國際捐款,這兩件都撐不久 ——
gmail 位址與免費子網域會直接影響大額捐款人的信任判斷。
The public address is GCDRcommunity@gmail.com and the site sits on a
pages.dev subdomain. Neither holds up once we are taking international
gifts — a gmail address and a free subdomain both weigh on how a large donor reads us.
要決定的:買 yoginiretreatmanang.org,並開
donate@、contact@、info@ 三個信箱 ——
誰去買、掛在誰名下、誰收 donate@ 的信。
To decide: buy yoginiretreatmanang.org and set up
donate@, contact@ and info@ — who buys it, in whose
name it is registered, and who reads donate@.
卡住什麼:網域一換,所有已經發出去的連結都要重導; 愈晚換,要追的連結愈多。 What it blocks: every link already sent out has to be redirected when the domain changes. The longer we wait, the more links there are to chase.
A 最急 —— 卡住其他事Blocking others
A1 · 刻名的實體形式是什麼?What form does the carving take?
石造建築、不用水泥。形式決定能放多少字、能不能事後補、要多少工 —— 而這三件事決定了截止日與文案怎麼寫。不定這一項,整個 campaign 沒辦法開始講。 Stone, no concrete. The form decides how many names fit, whether names can be added later, and how much labour it takes — which in turn set the deadline and the copy. Until this is settled the campaign cannot be described.
目前的方向:刻在外牆上。 Current direction: carved into the exterior wall. 但細節全部還要討論 —— 以下是要一起決定的。 But every detail is still open — these are what needs settling.
- 外牆嵌入刻名石,每一期一塊或一區,分期都刻得下 Inscribed stones set into the exterior wall, one per phase or per zone
- 單獨一面刻名牆(不依附建築,位置自由) A free-standing wall of names, not attached to a building
- 放進地基的名冊(可無限量,但看不見) A register placed in the foundation — unlimited, but unseen
要一起決定的細節:字多大、一塊放幾個名字、 刻在哪一面牆(誰看得到)、四種文字怎麼排、事後能不能補、風化與維護。 Details to settle together: letter size, names per stone, which wall (who sees it), how four scripts are set, whether names can be added later, weathering and upkeep.
A2 · 這一期刻名的截止日是哪一天?What is the carving deadline?
這是 campaign 的軸心。沒有截止日就沒有「現在就要行動」的理由, 而這個理由是工程本身給的 —— 石頭砌上去就不能再加名字。 This is the spine of the campaign. Without a date there is no reason to act now — and the reason is given by the work itself: once laid, no name can be added.
- 對齊地基完工日,往前抓 2–3 週給核對與刻工 Tie it to foundation completion, minus 2–3 weeks for checking and carving
A3 · 名字怎麼寫?How are names written?
本名?法名?家族名稱(已有先例)?「某某闔家」?
可不可以為已故者迴向留名? —— 最後這一項在佛教募款裡幾乎一定有人問。
刻錯的字在石頭上是永久的。
Given name? Dharma name? Family name (there is already a precedent)?
A household? May a name be entered in dedication for someone who has died? — that
question will certainly be asked. A mistake in stone is permanent.
- 全部允許,但一律由捐款人自己書寫確認,定稿後刻前再核一次 Allow all forms, but the supporter writes and confirms it; re-check before carving
A4 · 四種文字怎麼排?Four scripts on one stone
藏文、中文、英文、尼泊爾文可能出現在同一塊石頭上。 混排要先設計,不能到現場才想 —— 石匠不會替你解決排版。 Tibetan, Chinese, English and Nepali may all appear on one stone. The layout must be designed in advance — the mason will not solve typesetting for you.
B 十月前 —— 對外開口之前Before we go public, by October
B1 · 公開募款頁的內容與上線日The public appeal page
現在的網站是內部審閱版,不是募款頁 —— 這也是大家覺得亂的原因。 要把「對外介紹」和「對內決策」徹底分開。 The current site is an internal draft, not an appeal — which is exactly why it feels confusing. The public story and the internal decision log must be separated completely.
- 對外一頁式:為什麼 / 這個地方 / 要蓋什麼 / 今年募什麼 / 怎麼交代 One public page: why / the place / what is being built / this year's ask / how we report
B2 · 噶千仁波切影片的字幕Subtitles for the Garchen film
6 分 14 秒,純藏語。這是最強的國際素材,但沒有字幕等於沒有 —— 團隊和捐款人都看不懂。 Six minutes, in Tibetan. The strongest international asset we have, but without subtitles it does not exist — neither the team nor donors can follow it.
B3 · 瑪南要不要自己的 Facebook 專頁A Facebook page for Manang
現有兩個專頁是仁波切中文法教用的,跟這個計劃沒有關係。 瑪南應該以瑪南為主,不是掛在法教專頁底下。 The two existing pages are for Rinpoche's Chinese-language teaching and have nothing to do with this project. Manang should stand on its own.
- 開新專頁,現有兩個轉貼導流 Open a new page; cross-post from the existing two
- 先用現有專頁,之後再拆Use the existing pages for now
B4 · 誰負責交付?Who owns delivery?
沒有人負責的事不會發生。每個工程節點要交付照片、花費、 對到估價單哪一項 —— 這比募款文案更能決定第二年還有沒有人捐。 What no one owns does not happen. Each milestone needs photographs, spend, and the BoQ line it maps to — this determines second-year giving far more than any copy does.
C 冬季 campaign 之前Before the winter campaign
C1 · US$23,000「供養一間」怎麼講The US$23,000 level
已經有一位法友供養一間,他不在意是哪一間, 我們承諾的是讓他刻上家族名稱。這已經示範了正確的模式 —— 要的不是產權,是留名。 One supporter has already given for a cottage. He does not mind which one; what we promised was that his family name would be carved. That is the correct model already in practice.
- 改口徑不停用:「護持一間閉關房的建造」,不指定哪一間、不承諾時程, 承諾的是刻名。只在一對一談時提,不放公開頁 Keep it, change the wording: “support the building of a cottage” — no specific unit, no completion date; what is promised is the carving. Raised one-to-one only
C2 · 橋接額度找誰談Who to ask for a bridge
目前餘額 $11,406,已規劃支出 $11,791 —— 緩衝是負的。
募款以週為單位,工程款以天為單位,節奏對不上。
要的不是加碼募款,是「可撤回墊款承諾」:款未到位先墊,募到就還。
Balance $11,406 against $11,791 already committed — the buffer is negative.
Fundraising moves in weeks; construction payments in days.
The fix is not more fundraising but a recallable advance — covered if late, repaid when
the money arrives.
C3 · 電子報名單怎麼建Building the newsletter list
多年計劃唯一撐得住的關係渠道。社群平台的觸及會被演算法收走, email 不會。從第一筆捐款開始就要收 —— 之後補收非常困難。 The only channel that survives a multi-year project. Social reach is taken back by algorithms; email is not. Collect from the very first gift — retrofitting a list is far harder.
C4 · 網域用哪一個Which domain
manangyogini.org 與 yoginiretreatmanang.org
都已登記。選一個當正本,另一個轉址 —— 兩個並用會拆散 SEO 與分享連結。
Both manangyogini.org and yoginiretreatmanang.org are
registered. Pick one and redirect the other — running both splits links and search.
C5 · 兩種石刻怎麼並存?Two kinds of carving — how do they coexist?
已發布的護持方案承諾:每間閉關房一塊刻名石,放在那間房(給 $23,000 認領者)。
我們新提的是:所有護持者共同刻在一面牆上(給每一個人,不分金額)。
兩種都要做?還是只做一種? —— 這決定了募款文案怎麼寫,也決定要問石匠幾件事。
The published plan promises one plaque per cottage, at that cottage
(for the $23,000 dedicants). The new proposal is a shared wall carrying every supporter's
name, regardless of amount.
Both, or only one? This decides the copy and what we
ask the masons.
- 兩種都做:認領者有自己那間的刻名石,所有護持者另有一面共同的牆 —— 兩者不衝突,而且共同牆才是給小額捐款人的 Both: dedicants get their plaque, and everyone appears on a shared wall — they do not conflict, and the shared wall is what smaller gifts need
- 只做既有的每間一塊(小額捐款人就沒有留名) Only the per-room plaques (small gifts get no name)
C6 · 海拔對外用哪一個數字Which elevation figure to publish
園區蓋在坡地上,上下有高差,所以海拔本來就是一個範圍。 護持方案寫 3500(概數),其他文件寫 3,397。兩個都不算錯,但對外要一致, 不然讀者會以為我們自己搞不清楚。 The campus is on a slope, so the elevation is inherently a range. The dedication plan says 3,500 (approximate); other documents say 3,397. Neither is wrong, but the public figure must be consistent or readers assume we do not know.
- 統一寫「約 3,400 公尺」——誠實反映它是坡地,也不跟任何既有文件打架 Use “about 3,400 m” — honest about the slope, and it contradicts nothing already published
- 統一用 3,397(較精確,但坡上坡下其實不同) Use 3,397 (more precise, though it varies up and down the slope)
C7 · 既有的募款工具還在用嗎?Are the existing tools still live?
GCDR/Manang-tool/ 裡有 netlify.html 與
Code.gs(Google Apps Script),Manang-receipt/ 有收據產生器與試算表。
如果這些還在運作,新的募款頁要接上去,不要另做一套。
GCDR/Manang-tool/ holds a netlify.html and a
Code.gs Apps Script; Manang-receipt/ has a receipt generator and
spreadsheet. If these are live, the new page should connect to them rather than duplicate
them.
D 之後,但現在要記得Later — but on the record now
| 事項Item | 為什麼現在記下來Why note it now | |
|---|---|---|
| D1 | 後續期別的估價Costing the later phases | 度母殿、教學廳、老年閉關區、八塔都還沒有數字。 要先募到錢才能進設計 —— 這是雞生蛋的問題,要有人先啟動 Temple, teaching hall, elderly retreat, stupas have no figures. Money must come before design can start — someone has to break the loop |
| D2 | 匯率風險Currency exposure | 607K 跨越好幾年,NPR / USD / TWD 三段都會動 607K spans years across three currencies |
| D3 | 英文文案誰審Who reviews the English | 柏克萊講稿是現成英文,但新寫的需要母語者過目 The Berkeley transcript is already English; new copy needs a native reader |
| D4 | 家族老照片的人物辨識Identifying the archive photographs | Forefathers 86 張還沒有人認 ——
認得的人不會永遠都在
86 images in Forefathers are unidentified — the people who
can identify them will not always be here |
所有資料都在文庫裡Everything is in the Library
28 份原始文件,可以全文閱讀與搜尋。 不需要向誰要檔案,也不必找資料夾 —— 打開文庫,搜尋關鍵字就好。 28 source documents, readable and searchable in full. No need to ask anyone for files or hunt through folders — open the Library and search.
傳記(含藏文原稿)、仁波切的演講與談話逐字稿、村民訪談、 計劃文件、報價、SMA 設計簡報。約 33 萬字元,全文搜尋。 Biographies including the Tibetan originals, Rinpoche's talks and transcripts, the villager interviews, plan documents, quotations, SMA's design decks. About 330,000 characters, fully searchable.
- 仁波切的話 —— 柏克萊演講、Manang vision 談話、語錄 In Rinpoche's words — the Berkeley talk, the vision session, quotable passages
- 家族與傳記 —— 三代人的傳記,含藏文原稿 Family and biographies — three generations, with the Tibetan originals
- 村民的聲音 —— 七位村民訪談全文 Village voices — seven interviews in full
- 計劃文件 —— 孕育計劃、背景總整、募款規劃、媒體佈局 Plan documents — the incubation plan, background, fundraising, media
- 錢與報價 —— 護持方案、地基估價單 Money and quotations — the dedication plan, the foundation bill of quantities
- 建築與設計 —— SMA 概念設計、度母殿構想 Architecture — SMA's concept design and the temple ideas